PLAY PODCASTS
JUDGEMENTS | When a former PM took on the media [Lange v ABC]
Season 3 · Episode 272

JUDGEMENTS | When a former PM took on the media [Lange v ABC]

Crime Insiders · LiSTNR

October 22, 202520m 0s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (enrichment.soundstack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

In the early 1990s, former New Zealand Prime Minister David Lange found himself at the center of a defamation storm in Australia.

The ABC re-broadcast allegations suggesting he acted improperly while in office. Lange sued, sparking a legal battle that reached the High Court and tested the limits of free political communication under the Constitution. Lange v ABC set a landmark precedent: political speech is protected, but not at the expense of personal reputation.

In this episode, we unpack the courtroom drama, the judgment, and the enduring impact on media, politics, and the law in Australia.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Topics

political communicationhigh Courtimplied freedomZealand Labor PartyZealand election campaignLang versus ABCprime ministerDavid Langnetwork entitled fronthold public officeproper political conductinfluence government policybig business interestsSir Frank renewftelevision programpolitical mattersApril nineteenSupreme Courtdebt incurredgovernment contractpolitical speechSir Frank renewDan Mullinscitizens alikeSouth WalesSir FrankFrank renewmatter complainedgrossly defamatorydefamatory broadcasttheophonist casequalified privilegedefamation lawweekly timesAustralian Constitutionbroader defenseLang casediscussing governmentland caseMedia organizationfree speechindividual reputationpersonal reputationLiSTNR crime