PLAY PODCASTS
JUDGEMENTS | Determining criminal enterprise  [Miller v Miller]
Season 3 · Episode 251

JUDGEMENTS | Determining criminal enterprise [Miller v Miller]

Crime Insiders · LiSTNR

September 3, 202517m 46s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (enrichment.soundstack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

A stolen car, a drunken joyride, and a woman left with injuries so severe, she’ll live with them for the rest of her life.

What happens when a crime becomes a civil lawsuit?  When the thief becomes the victim and the driver becomes the one left holding the legal wheel?

Miller v Miller is one of Australia's most significant legal challenges, determining if someone is still involved in the committing of a crime if they actively pursue leaving the criminal enterprise.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Topics

Miller versus Millerjoint Illegal enterprisecommon Illegal purposehigh Courtreasonable stepscriminal lawmoron owed Donnelljoint criminal enterprisecommon unlawful purposeWestern Australiacriminal codedangerous drivingcommon purposestolen carcivil lawDan Mullinsdeep divedenell Millercar parkdinell askedmoron Millercab rankMorin drovedistrict CourtIllegal enterpriseIllegal conductCourt heldEffectively withdrawnCourt concludedreasonable carerecover damagesillegality defensestatutory purposerelevant criminalcivil liabilityeffective withdrawalLiSTNR crime