Episode 356
Safety Critical C++
Andreas Weis joins Timur and Phil. After some news about Boost, std::format and performance, Andreas talks to us about safety critical application domains, safety in C++ in general, and the difference between safety in security.
CppCast · Phil Nash & Timur Doumler
March 17, 20231h 11m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (media.transistor.fm) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Andreas Weis joins Timur and Phil. After some news about Boost, std::format and performance, Andreas talks to us about safety critical application domains, safety in C++ in general, and the difference between safety in security.
News
- Boost libraries may drop support for older language versions
- "Fun with printing tables with std::format and C++20" - Bartlomiej Filipek
- "C++20 Formatting Library, Parts 1. 2 and 3" - Gajendra Gulgulia
- "Decreasing the Number of Memory Accesses, 1/2" - Ivica Bogosavljevic
- using std::cpp (conference in Madrid)
Links
- MUC++ (The Munich C++ User Group)
- ComicSansMs - Andreas on StackOverflow
- The EU's Cyber Resilience Act
- "Why not simply implement borrow checking in C++?" - Sean Baxter on Twitter
- P2771R0 - "Towards memory safety in C++"
- "Rust Safety is not superior to C++" - Bjarne Stroustrup
- P2739R0 - "A call to action: Think seriously about 'safety'; then do something sensible about it"
- P2759R1 - "DG Opinion on safety for ISO C++"
- P2723R1 - "Zero-initialize objects of automatic storage duration"
- D2795R0 - "Correct and incorrect code, and 'erroneous behaviour'"
- P2809R0 - "Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior"
- MISRA