PLAY PODCASTS
FASTING DAY 01 - The Shocking Truth: God Only Commanded ONE Fast
Season 3 · Episode 2

FASTING DAY 01 - The Shocking Truth: God Only Commanded ONE Fast

COACH: Church Origins and Church History courtesy of the That’s Jesus Channel

January 18, 202615m 45s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (mcdn.podbean.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Video Description [The Hook] If you grew up thinking fasting was a frequent, mandatory requirement in the Bible, you’re about to be surprised. In the entire Old Testament—all 39 books, all the laws—God only commanded His people to fast on one specific day per year. [The Content] In Day 1 of our 21-Day Fasting History series, we examine Leviticus 16 and the "Day of Atonement" (Yom Kippur). We unpack the Hebrew phrase anah nephesh ("afflict your soul") and explain why this single day was the only time God said, "You MUST fast." We also explore the massive implication of this fact: Every other fast in the Bible was voluntary. From David fasting for his dying son to Esther fasting for her people, these were voluntary acts of desperation and devotion that God honored, even though He didn't command them. [What We Cover] • The Command: Leviticus 16 and the High Priest's entry into the Holy of Holies. • The Hebrew: What anah nephesh really means (humbling/afflicting the soul). • The Contrast: The difference between the one commanded fast and the voluntary fasts of David, Daniel, and Esther. • The Application: If God isn't forcing you to do this 21-day fast, why are you doing it? We explore three biblical motivations for voluntary fasting. [Series Context] This is Day 1 of a 21-Day series connecting church history to spiritual transformation. Yesterday we defined fasting; today we look at the Old Testament law. Tomorrow (Day 2), we’ll look at the "human-made" fasts the Jews created after Jerusalem burned—and the heartbreaking question God asked about them. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEO Keywords & Tags Primary Keywords: Biblical Fasting, Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur, Leviticus 16, Is fasting a command, Christian Fasting History, Anah Nephesh. Long-Tail Keywords: How many times did God command fasting, Difference between commanded and voluntary fasting, Why do Christians fast 21 days, Old Testament fasting rules, Meaning of afflict your soul. Hashtags: #BiblicalFasting #Leviticus16 #DayOfAtonement #ChristianHistory #21DaysOfPrayer #YomKippur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Social Media Captions (Short Form) Option 1 (The Fact Check): Pop quiz: How many times did God command the Israelites to fast in the Old Testament? A) Weekly B) Monthly C) Once a year The answer is C. Just one day: The Day of Atonement. In Day 1 of our history series, we explain why God only required one day, and why biblical figures like Daniel and Esther fasted voluntarily anyway. Option 2 (The Challenge): God isn't forcing you to fast these 21 days. He only commanded one fast in the entire Old Testament (Leviticus 16). So why are you doing it? If it’s not to earn salvation or check a religious box, what is your motive? Watch Day 1 to find out why voluntary fasting is often more powerful than mandatory fasting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blog Post / Podcast Show Notes Summary In Day 1, we dismantle the idea that fasting is a legalistic requirement by going straight to the source: Leviticus 16. We discover that the "Day of Atonement" was the only mandated fast in Israel's history. We explore the Hebrew concept of anah nephesh ("afflicting the soul") and contrast this single command with the voluntary fasting practices of heroes like David and Esther. The episode concludes by challenging modern believers to identify their motivation: are you fasting because you feel forced, or are you voluntarily seeking God to "not take His presence for granted"?