
CC039: The Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism - Stephen Law, Tyler McNabb, and others
This Theist/Atheist Discussion features a number …
Capturing Christianity Podcast · Cameron Bertuzzi
June 23, 20201h 52m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (feeds.soundcloud.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
This Theist/Atheist Discussion features a number of guests, most notably Tyler McNabb and Stephen Law (who recently had an exchange on Unbelievable? on the subject of Reformed Epistemology). The other guests joining are: Cameron Bertuzzi (myself), Josh Parikh, Perry Hendricks, Brett Lunn, Ben Watkins, Ben Bavar.
The topic of discussion is Alvin Plantinga's (in)famous Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. The argument roughly states that the probability our cognitive faculties are reliable given Naturalism & Evolution is low. Hence, the person that believes N&E has a defeater for all of their beliefs, including belief in N&E. Belief in N&E is therefore self-referentially incoherent and cannot rationally be accepted.
Link to the YouTube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUeGYXb_ITk&t=348s
Our Website: www.capturingchristianity.com
Our Patreon: www.patreon.com/capturingchristianity