Ep 149: Quality of Care Studies in Anesthesia – Fact vs Myth
Beyond The Mask: Innovation & Opportunities For CRNAs · Jeremy Stanley
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (mcdn.podbean.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
For the past 50+ years, numerous quality of care studies have been published that evaluated outcomes based on the anesthesia provider. These studies have produced great data but some of the research methods and findings were flawed. That’s been used by the ASA and AANA to promote agendas. We’ve invited Nancy Bruton-Maree, CRNA, and Sandy Ouellette, CRNA, back on the show to tell us about the different studies through the years and sort out the difference between fact and fiction.
Read more: https://beyondthemaskpodcast.com/ep-149-quality-of-care-studies-in-anesthesia-fact-vs-myth/3034/
AANA Document: Quality of Care in Anesthesia
Get the CE certificate here: https://beyondthemaskpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Beyond-the-Mask-CE-Cert-FILLABLE.pdf
What we discuss on this episode:
4:27 – An overview of the studies and findings
6:58 – Studies from the 1970s and 80s
10:58 – Bechtodt study
14:48 – When Sandy was president elect
17:30 – The Silber Study
24:00 – Flawed results
26:45 – Analysis by Dr. Michael Pine
31:48 – Abenstein and Warmer article in 1996
32:27 – Vila Study in Archives of Study
33:17 – Dulisse & Cromwell study
38:15 – Needleman study in 2008
39:41 – Simonson study in 2007
41:15 – What do we know now in 2021?
43:05 – How to learn more
48:04 – We need to keep producing data
53:21 – The future is quality, cost and access