![Snyder v. U.S., No. 23-108 [Arg: 4.15.2024]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/314873/post/143791080/d75eaea7f72f080a4b9ef28a74d4c652.jpg)
Snyder v. U.S., No. 23-108 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (api.substack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efdIssue(s): Whether section 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions. Particularly debating the word “corruptly” as defined by the Biden DOJ.
The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe