![SCOTUS Arguments - Chevron Cases Relentless and Loper, No. 22-1219 and No. 22-451 [Arg: 1.17.2024]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/314873/post/141009139/9baf5c75291f4ad22d5a01f3eaa60aa2.jpg)
SCOTUS Arguments - Chevron Cases Relentless and Loper, No. 22-1219 and No. 22-451 [Arg: 1.17.2024]
Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (api.substack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efdThese are very interesting cases, as the issue is whether Federal Agencies can make laws or mandates, not specifically in their purview, without authorizing legislation.
Relentless v. Department of Commerce, No. 22-1219 [Arg: 1.17.2024]
Issue(s): Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, No. 22-451 [Arg: 1.17.2024]
Issue(s): Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.
Gene Douglass for Congress, NC #2 Battle Good v Evil is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
If you wish to donate to my campaign here is the link below: To Donate to my campaign for the US House NC #2.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe