![O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, No. 22-324 [Arg: 10.31.2023]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/314873/post/138838916/ec89a68b06d9c0cf7e3df8d965707546.jpg)
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, No. 22-324 [Arg: 10.31.2023]
Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (api.substack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efdO’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, No. 22-324 [Arg: 10.31.2023]
Issue(s): Whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official’s personal social media account, when the official uses the account to feature their job and communicate about job-related matters with the public, but does not do so pursuant to any governmental authority or duty.
Gene Douglass for Congress, NC #2 Battle Good v Evil is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
If you wish to donate to my campaign here is the link below: To Donate to my campaign for the US House NC #2.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe