![Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/314873/post/160519089/36885a69dcd5aa702b8358372dc09bf0.jpg)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]
Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (api.substack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efd
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]
Issue(s): (1) Whether the Hobbs Act, which authorizes a “party aggrieved” by an agency’s “final order” to petition for review in a court of appeals, allows nonparties to obtain review of claims asserting that an agency order exceeds the agency’s statutory authority; and (2) whether the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 permit the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license private entities to temporarily store spent nuclear fuel away from the nuclear-reactor sites where the spent fuel was generated.
The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe