![Missouri v Biden (Murthy v. Missouri), No. 23-411 [Arg: 3.18.2024]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/314873/post/142735995/174038dad7b37563b725aace2f076e31.jpg)
Missouri v Biden (Murthy v. Missouri), No. 23-411 [Arg: 3.18.2024]
Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (api.substack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efdIssue(s): (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.
The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe