Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (traffic.libsyn.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
This question comes up whenever I discuss philanthropy.
It would seem that capitalism is better than charity. The countries that became permanently rich, like America and Japan, did it with capitalism. This seems better than temporarily alleviating poverty by donating food or clothing. So (say proponents), good people who want to help others should stop giving to charity and start giving to capitalism. These proponents differ on exactly what "giving to capitalism" means - you can't write a check to capitalism directly. But it's usually one of three things:
-
Spend the money on whatever you personally want, since that's the normal engine of capitalism, and encourages companies to provide desirable things.
-
Invest the money in whatever company produces the highest rate of return, since that's another capitalist imperative, and creates more companies.
-
Do something like donating to charity, but the donation should go to charities that promote capitalism somehow, or be an investment in companies doing charitable things (impact investing)
https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/does-capitalism-beat-charity