Ask Dr. E

What does 1 Corinthians 11:7 mean when it says, “man is the glory of God, but woman is the glory of man”? And how does that fit with Genesis 1:27, where both male and female are created in the image of God? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley answers a thoughtful question about one of the Bible’s most debated passages on men, women, creation, worship, and God’s design. He explains why this verse is often misunderstood and why Paul’s words are not about inferiority, but about context, order, and reflecting God’s glory. Dr. Easley also unpacks the meaning of the word helper (ezer) in Genesis, why that word is not demeaning, and how passages about submission, leadership, marriage, and worship should be understood carefully and biblically. Chapters 00:00 The question: What does 1 Corinthians 11:7 mean? 01:27 Why context is everything in 1 Corinthians 02:12 Paul’s concern: order, decorum, and worship 03:20 What does “glory” mean in this passage? 03:43 Why “helper” is not a lesser role 05:00 “Image” vs. “glory” explained 05:57 Does a woman reflect her husband’s glory or God’s? 07:06 What does ezer mean in Genesis? 07:45 Is “helper” only about marriage? 08:27 Leadership, submission, and biblical roles 09:33 Why is Adam blamed for sin instead of Eve? 11:30 Why don’t women wear head coverings today? 12:52 Final thoughts and resources Key Topics Covered 1 Corinthians 11 explained Genesis 1:27 and the image of God What it means that woman is the glory of man The biblical meaning of helper / ezer Men and women in God’s design Marriage, leadership, and submission Head coverings in the Bible Why context matters in difficult passages Biblical manhood and womanhood Understanding Paul’s corrective teaching in Corinth Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Is Lent biblical? Should Christians observe it? And how should believers think about spiritual practices leading up to Easter? In this episode, Dr. E answers a question about Lent, church tradition, Easter preparation, and the finished work of Christ. While many Christians use Lent as a season of reflection before Resurrection Sunday, Dr. Easley explains why the Bible does not command Lent and why believers should be cautious when tradition begins to blur the line between grace and religious performance. Dr. E walks through the history of Lent, its connection to the early church and baptismal preparation, and how it later became associated with penance and ritual. He also addresses an important theological issue: if Jesus fully paid for our sins, what role—if any—should practices like fasting, giving something up, or special seasons of repentance play in the Christian life? Chapters 00:00 Why Lent raises important theological questions 00:19 Today’s listener question: Is using the word Lent unbiblical? 01:06 Is Lent prescribed anywhere in the Bible? 01:09 The historical origin of Lent in the early church 02:00 How Lent became connected to penance and tradition 02:43 The deeper theological concern behind Lent 03:29 Repentance, forgiveness, and the role of the church 04:11 Why penance and purgatory matter in this conversation 04:47 Why many Protestants still observe Lent 05:30 If Christ fully paid for sin, what’s left to do? 06:21 Can intentional Easter preparation still be helpful? 08:18 Ritual, remembrance, and preparing for holy moments 09:28 Why spiritual benchmarks can still be meaningful Key Topics Covered -Is Lent biblical? -What the Bible says about Lent -The history and origin of Lent -Lent in the early church -Lent and Catholic tradition -Penance vs. grace -The sufficiency of Christ’s atonement -Should Protestants observe Lent? -Spiritual disciplines before Easter -How to prepare your heart for Resurrection Sunday -Ritual, remembrance, and the Christian life -Easter traditions for Christian families 🎧 Listen to full episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or at michaelincontext.com 👍 Like this video, subscribe, and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

In this episode, Dr. E answers a challenging question about the timeline of Jesus’ crucifixion. From the “sign of Jonah” to the apparent differences between the Synoptic Gospels and John, Dr. Easley walks through how to understand these passages in their proper historical and cultural context. What about the “three days and three nights”? Did Jesus celebrate Passover before or after His arrest? And if the accounts don’t line up perfectly, can we still trust the Bible? Dr. Easley explains how ancient Jewish idioms, feast practices, and eyewitness perspectives help resolve these tensions. Rather than weakening Scripture, these differences actually strengthen its credibility and reliability. If you’ve ever wrestled with questions about Gospel contradictions, biblical inerrancy, or the accuracy of Jesus’ resurrection timeline, this episode will give you clarity and confidence in God’s Word. Key Topics Covered -The “sign of Jonah” and what Jesus meant by three days and three nights -Why a 72-hour timeline isn’t required for the resurrection -Differences between the Synoptic Gospels and John -The Passover timeline and Jesus’ final meal -Jewish idioms and how they affect biblical interpretation -What biblical inerrancy really means -Why Gospel differences strengthen, not weaken, credibility -How oral tradition preserved the accounts of Jesus Chapters 00:00 What About Gospel Contradictions? 01:05 The “Sign of Jonah” Explained 02:30 Do Three Days Mean 72 Hours? 04:00 Understanding Jewish Time Language 05:40 The Passover Timeline Problem 07:00 Synoptic Gospels vs. John 08:30 Did Jesus Eat the Passover Meal? 10:00 Why the Accounts Differ 11:30 What Is Biblical Inerrancy? 13:00 Do Differences Undermine Scripture? 14:30 Why the Bible Is Still Reliable 16:00 Final Thoughts & Encouragement Links Mentioned: The Diary of a CEO Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Did the Garden of Eden have boundaries? Was it a small, defined location—or did Adam and Eve have access to the whole earth? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley walks through Genesis 2 to explore what Scripture actually says about Eden, its rivers, its geography, and what changed after the fall. Becky and her husband are debating whether the Garden was a specific locale with borders or part of a fully accessible world. Dr. Easley explains what we can know, what we can reasonably infer, and where we must admit Scripture is silent. He also discusses the pre-flood world, the naming of the Tigris and Euphrates, the curse on the ground, and whether Adam and Eve may have been in the Garden for a surprisingly short time. Curiosity is good. Speculation is tempting. But God has given us exactly what we need. If you’ve ever wondered where Eden was—or how long Adam and Eve were there—this episode is for you. Chapters 00:00 The Question About Eden 01:40 What Genesis 2 Actually Says 03:30 The Pre-Flood World Explained 06:45 Did the Garden Have Boundaries? 08:30 How Long Were They in Eden? 10:15 What We Really Need to Know Key Topics Discussed: Genesis 2 and the rivers of Eden Pre-flood geography and the reshaping of the earth The curse on the serpent and the ground The possibility of a localized Garden How quickly the fall may have happened Why Scripture leaves some details unexplained Links Mentioned Answers in Genesis Answers in Genesis for kids The Answers Books For Kids by Ken Ham, Bodie Hodge, Cindy Malott Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

In this episode, Dr. E answers a question about universalism, free will, and predestination. Scripture says God desires all to come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9; 1 Timothy 2:4). But Jesus also says many take the wide path to destruction. So how do we reconcile those truths? Does God’s will fail? Are we given the option to accept or reject salvation? If God is omnipotent, why doesn’t He save everyone? Does He desire salvation for all but prioritize something else — like justice or glory? Dr. Easley explains the difference between God’s sovereign will and the universal call to salvation. He walks through key passages like Ephesians 1, John 6, and Romans 9 and addresses the tension between divine sovereignty and human responsibility. Rather than forcing a philosophical solution, Dr. Easley encourages believers to hold both biblical truths faithfully. From our limited perspective, we see tension. From God’s eternal perspective, His will is perfect. If you’ve wrestled with election, predestination, Calvinism, Arminianism, or the question “Why aren’t all saved?” — this episode is for you. Chapters 00:00 – The Question: If God Wants All Saved, Why Aren’t All Saved? 01:30 – What Does “Rectify” Mean? 02:00 – Election in Ephesians 1 03:00 – God Desires All to Repent (2 Peter 3; 1 Timothy 2) 04:00 – The Will of the Father (John 6:40) 05:00 – Sovereignty, Free Will, and Tension 06:00 – Romans 9 and the Character of God 08:00 – Why This Doctrine Applies to Believers Key Topics Discussed -Election and predestination in Scripture (Ephesians 1:4–5) -God’s desire that all come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9; 1 Timothy 2:4) -Why most will not be saved (the wide vs. narrow path) -The difference between universal salvation and the universal call to salvation -God’s sovereign will vs. human responsibility -The meaning of “antinomy” — holding two true tensions in Scripture -John 6:40 and the will of the Father -Romans 9 and careful interpretation of hard passages -Unlimited atonement vs. limited atonement -Why election applies to believers, not unbelievers -The character of God — not capricious, but holy, just, and merciful -Why some theological tensions cannot be fully resolved from a human perspective Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

What happens when someone who once professed faith in Christ later renounces it and calls themselves an atheist?In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Michael Easley answers one of the most difficult questions Christians face: Can you lose your salvation?Dr. Easley walks through key passages like Ephesians 1:13, John 3:16, John 10:27–28, and Romans 8 to explain the doctrine of eternal security. He also addresses the theological divide influenced by Jacob Arminius and how different Christian traditions understand perseverance.If you’re praying for someone who has walked away from the faith, this conversation will ground you in Scripture and give you practical clarity.Salvation rests on Christ’s finished work — not our fluctuating faithfulness.Chapters00:00 – The Question: What If Someone Walks Away?01:45 – Sealed with the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13)03:05 – “No One Can Snatch Them” (John 10)04:30 – Can You Remove Yourself from God’s Hand?05:20 – Romans 8 and the Golden Chain of Salvation06:45 – Apathy, Sin, or Never Truly Saved?08:00 – What Should We Do for a Prodigal Friend?09:00 – Pray Boldly and Speak TruthKey Topics Discussed-Eternal security vs. losing salvation-The sealing of the Holy Spirit-Once saved, always saved — what it really means-Arminian vs. Reformed perspectives-The “golden chain” of salvation in Romans 8-How to respond when someone renounces their faith-Praying for prodigalsFind more episodes of Ask Dr. E here.If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

What is the Legacy Standard Bible (LSB), and how does it compare to the NASB? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley answers a listener’s question about the LSB translation, explaining its connection to the New American Standard Bible and the translation philosophy behind it. He discusses formal equivalency, why certain wording choices were updated, and how readers should think about choosing a Bible translation. Dr. Easley also reminds listeners that while English speakers have access to dozens of translations, many languages around the world only have one — making the most important step simply reading Scripture consistently. If you’ve ever wondered which Bible translation to use for study or daily reading, this episode will help you think wisely and practically about the options available. Chapters 0:00 Intro to Ask Dr. E 0:22 Question about the Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) 1:05 Background of the NASB and LSB 2:17 Why reading the Bible’s introduction matters 3:14 Translation changes in the LSB (Yahweh, doulos, etc.) 5:22 The MacArthur Study Bible and translation history 6:27 Formal vs. dynamic equivalency explained 7:20 Choosing a translation for study vs. reading 7:58 Final encouragement to read Scripture consistently Key Topics Covered -Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) overview -NASB translation history -Formal equivalency vs dynamic equivalency -Translating Yahweh in the Old Testament -The meaning of doulos (“slave” vs “bondservant”) -Choosing a Bible translation for study -Why consistency in Bible reading matters Links Mentioned Abner Chou on inContext Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

How do you explain salvation to a toddler without oversimplifying the gospel — or pressuring them into a decision they don’t understand? In this episode, Dr. E answers a parenting question about helping young children understand faith, sin, and salvation. He explains why children can grasp concepts like trust, belief, and faith, even before they fully understand theology, and encourages parents to focus on consistent discipleship instead of a single “decision moment.” Drawing from Deuteronomy 6, the Gospels, and key passages like Ephesians 2:8–9 and Romans 10:9, Dr. Easley shows how everyday conversations and simple gospel explanations can shape a child’s understanding over time. Parents don’t have to carry the burden of saving their children — God loves them even more than we do. Our role is to teach faithfully, pray consistently, and trust God’s work. If you’re a parent, grandparent, or ministry leader wondering how to talk about salvation with children, this episode will encourage and equip you. Chapters 00:00 — Can children understand faith? 00:34 — A parent’s question about explaining salvation 01:41 — Should parents avoid “decision pressure”? 03:32 — Salvation vs. sanctification in a child’s life 03:48 — Why “ask Jesus into your heart” can confuse kids 04:53 — Deuteronomy 6 and everyday discipleship 07:27 — Explaining faith using simple illustrations 08:28 — Jesus’ teaching about childlike faith 10:33 — Teachable moments in parenting 12:06 — Explaining the gospel with four key verses 14:26 — Trusting God with your children’s faith Key Topics Discussed Teaching the gospel to toddlers and young children Faith, trust, and belief in early childhood Parenting without fear-based salvation decisions Deuteronomy 6 and family discipleship Avoiding confusing salvation language with kids The difference between salvation and sanctification Using simple gospel illustrations for children Trusting God with your child’s spiritual growth Links Mentioned: Dr. Larry Fowler of The Legacy Coalition on inContext Board books for toddlers Tales That Tell The Truth Series Big Truths About Our Big God Series Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Why don’t Jews still offer animal sacrifices if the Old Testament law still applies? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley answers a thoughtful listener question by walking through Jewish history, Scripture, and the book of Hebrews.Dr. Easley explains the differences within modern Judaism, why the sacrificial system requires very specific biblical conditions, and how the destruction of the temple in AD 70 made sacrifices impossible under the law. He also explores the significance of the red heifer, the role of the priesthood, and why the author of Hebrews points to Jesus as the once-for-all sacrifice who fulfilled the entire system.This episode is a helpful guide for anyone trying to understand Judaism, the Old Testament sacrificial system, and why Christians believe Jesus is fully sufficient—no temple required.Chapters00:00 Introduction to the Sacrificial System00:48 Understanding Jewish Sects and Their Practices02:24 The Historical Context of Sacrifices05:24 Modern Implications: The Red Heifer and the Temple Institute08:03 Theological Reflections on Sacrifices and ChristKey Topics Covered-Why Jews no longer offer animal sacrifices-The destruction of the temple in AD 70-Orthodox vs. Conservative vs. Reformed Judaism-The red heifer and ritual purification-Hebrews 9 and Jesus as the final sacrifice-Do Christians need a future temple? Links Mentioned: Reasoning From The Scriptures with Catholics by Dr. Ron Rhodes Why Do Protestants Convert? By Chris Castaldo Chris Castaldo on inContext 10 Most Important Things You Can Say to a Catholic By Dr. Ron Rhodes If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Why don’t Jews still offer animal sacrifices if the Old Testament law still applies? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley answers a thoughtful listener question by walking through Jewish history, Scripture, and the book of Hebrews. Dr. Easley explains the differences within modern Judaism, why the sacrificial system requires very specific biblical conditions, and how the destruction of the temple in AD 70 made sacrifices impossible under the law. He also explores the significance of the red heifer, the role of the priesthood, and why the author of Hebrews points to Jesus as the once-for-all sacrifice who fulfilled the entire system. This episode is a helpful guide for anyone trying to understand Judaism, the Old Testament sacrificial system, and why Christians believe Jesus is fully sufficient—no temple required. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Sacrificial System 00:48 Understanding Jewish Sects and Their Practices 02:24 The Historical Context of Sacrifices 05:24 Modern Implications: The Red Heifer and the Temple Institute 08:03 Theological Reflections on Sacrifices and Christ Key Topics Covered -Why Jews no longer offer animal sacrifices -The destruction of the temple in AD 70 -Orthodox vs. Conservative vs. Reformed Judaism -The red heifer and ritual purification -Hebrews 9 and Jesus as the final sacrifice -Do Christians need a future temple? If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Fear shows up in many forms—panic attacks, self-doubt, trauma responses, or everyday anxiety. In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley responds to a listener’s honest question: What is the best way for believers to overcome fear? Dr. Easley offers a thoughtful, biblically grounded response that acknowledges the complexity of fear. Some fear requires professional counseling. Some fear is rooted in trauma. And some fear must be confronted through renewed thinking shaped by Scripture. These approaches aren’t in conflict—they work together. Drawing from passages like Joshua 1, Romans 12, and Psalm 27, Dr. Easley reminds us that God commands courage not because we are strong—but because we are often weak and afraid. Fear is not a failure of faith; it is a shared human condition. And God meets us there. This episode offers clarity, compassion, and practical steps for believers who want real help—not clichés—when fear feels overwhelming. Chapters 00:00 – Why Fear Is So Common 01:55 – Different Types of Fear Explained 03:45 – When Counseling and Therapy Are Wise 05:00 – The Power of Biblical Self-Talk 06:30 – Why “Do Not Fear” Is Repeated in Scripture 08:05 – Courage Spoken to the Fearful (Joshua 1) 09:30 – Psalm 27 and Fearless Trust 11:10 – How Scripture Rewires the Anxious Mind 12:00 – Why You Shouldn’t Face Fear Alone Key Topics Discussed -Biblical responses to fear and anxiety -Panic attacks vs. situational fear -Trauma and counseling for Christians -Scripture-based self-talk -Memorizing Scripture for anxiety -Why God commands courage -Psalm 27 and fearless trust -Community, vulnerability, and healing Links Mentioned: Jon Gauger on inContext Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Did God have a language? Did Adam and Eve speak Hebrew—or something else entirely? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley explores what the Bible reveals about language at creation, the Tower of Babel, and how God communicated with humanity from the very beginning.Walking through Genesis, Hebrew, and the broader family of Semitic languages, Dr. Easley explains why Scripture doesn’t give a definitive answer—but does give meaningful insight. From Adam naming the animals to the confusion of languages at Babel and the unity of tongues in Acts 2, this episode connects theology, history, and biblical literacy in a thoughtful and accessible way.Whether you’re curious about Hebrew, biblical inspiration, or how oral tradition shaped Scripture before it was written, this conversation invites you to ask better questions—and trust the authority of God’s Word.Key Topics Discussed• Did God, Adam, and Eve share a language?• Hebrew and the family of Semitic languages• Language and communication before the Fall• Adam naming the animals in Genesis• The Tower of Babel and the origin of languages• Ethnicities and people groups in Scripture• Acts 2 as the reversal of Babel• Oral tradition before the written Pentateuch• Moses, authorship, and biblical inspiration• Why Scripture leaves room for mysteryChapters00:00 – Introduction00:19 – Did God and Adam share a language?01:25 – What Scripture tells us—and what it doesn’t01:52 – Hebrew and Semitic language roots02:40 – Was there a pre-Fall or “holy” language?03:10 – Adam naming the animals04:05 – The Tower of Babel explained04:40 – Acts 2 and the unity of language05:23 – Oral tradition and writing the Pentateuch06:15 – Inspiration and authority of Scripture06:57 – Final thoughts If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

What are the biblical covenants—and why do they matter today? In this Ask Dr. E episode, Dr. Michael Easley explains the major covenants in the Bible and how they point directly to Jesus Christ. Dr. Easley walks through the Edenic, Noahic, Mosaic, Abrahamic, Davidic, and New Covenants, clarifying the difference between unilateral and bilateral covenants. He shows how human failure under the law reveals the need for a Savior and why the Abrahamic, Davidic, and New Covenants are central to God’s redemptive plan. This episode helps connect the Old Testament to the New Testament and explains how Jesus fulfills every covenant through His shed blood. If you want a clear, biblical explanation of covenant theology—without the confusion—this conversation will deepen your understanding of Scripture and God’s faithfulness. Chapters 00:00 – Bible Covenants Explained 00:45 – What Is a Covenant? 01:40 – Edenic Covenant 02:30 – Noahic Covenant 03:20 – Abrahamic Covenant 04:15 – Mosaic Covenant 05:10 – Davidic Covenant 06:05 – New Covenant 07:15 – Why God Must Keep the Covenant 08:30 – Jesus at the Center Key Topics Discussed -What a biblical covenant is and what it means to “cut” a covenant -The Edenic covenant and humanity’s first failure -The Noahic covenant as a unilateral promise to all creation -The Abrahamic covenant and God’s unconditional promise -The Mosaic covenant, the law, and the blessing–curse framework -The Davidic covenant and the promise of a Messianic king -The New Covenant and Jesus’ blood as its fulfillment -The difference between unilateral and bilateral covenants -Why human inability reveals the need for a Savior -How all biblical covenants ultimately point to Christ If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

What role should grandparents play in shaping your child’s faith? And what do you do when their beliefs—or involvement—don’t align with yours? In this episode. Dr. E responds to a parent navigating complicated family dynamics, spiritual differences, and the pressure to ensure grandparents become spiritual influences in their grandchildren’s lives. Dr. Easley offers wisdom, realism, and biblical perspective—reminding parents that their primary calling is to disciple their own children, not fix extended family relationships. The conversation explores honoring parents without forcing spiritual outcomes, setting healthy boundaries, and understanding teens as “free agents” who must ultimately own their faith. Dr. Easley also highlights the often-overlooked influence of youth leaders, mentors, and trusted adults God places in a teenager’s life when family relationships are limited or strained.If you’re parenting preteens or teenagers, navigating blended beliefs, or feeling overwhelmed by family expectations, this episode will bring clarity, peace, and encouragement. Chapters 00:00 – The Question 01:00 – Who Is This Episode Really For? 03:15 – Honor Without Unrealistic Expectations 04:30 – Is It the Parent’s Job to Facilitate Grandparent Relationships? 05:55 – When Protection Comes First 06:45 – Focus on Your Teen, Not the Grandparents 07:55 – Teens Are Free Agents 09:05 – The Role of Youth Leaders and Mentors 10:30 – Investing in Those Who Influence Your Teen 11:50 – Final Encouragement to Parents Key Topics Covered -Grandparents and spiritual influence -Parenting teens with mixed-belief families -Healthy boundaries with extended family -Honoring parents biblically -Discipling preteens and teenagers -Teens as spiritual free agents -Youth pastors and mentors as faith influencers -Letting go of control in parenting -Faith formation beyond the nuclear family Links Mentioned: Larry Fowler: Legacy Coalition on inContext 🎧 Listen to full episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or at michaelincontext.com If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Can Christians biblically support the modern nation of Israel—or is that a theological mistake? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley responds to a viral question about Genesis 12, political leaders quoting Scripture, and whether God’s promises to Abraham apply to Israel today. Dr. Easley explains the Abrahamic Covenant as an unconditional, unilateral promise that unfolds across Genesis 12, 15, and 17. He addresses common misunderstandings about covenant theology, replacement theology, and the belief that the church has replaced Israel in God’s plan. Drawing from Romans 9–11, Judges, Deuteronomy, and biblical history, Dr. Easley shows why God’s land promise remains intact—and why it cannot be dismissed as merely symbolic or political. The conversation also explores how God works through history, governments, and flawed leaders under His providence, reminding listeners to be cautious of “clickbait theology” and oversimplified social media takes. Rather than offering partisan talking points, this episode encourages careful Bible study, theological humility, and a bigger view of God’s redemptive purposes. If you’ve wrestled with questions about Israel, modern politics, and Scripture—or felt confused by online debates—this episode will help you think biblically and clearly. Key Topics Covered -Does the Bible support modern Israel? -The Abrahamic Covenant explained (Genesis 12, 15, 17) -Is the land promise to Israel still valid today? -Covenant theology vs. replacement theology -Romans 9–11 and Israel in God’s redemptive plan -God’s sovereignty and providence in world history -Christians, geopolitics, and biblical interpretation -Political leaders using Scripture correctly or incorrectly -Blessing Israel: biblical meaning vs. modern politics -How Christians should think about Israel today Chapters 00:00 Theological Foundations of Land Promises 02:48 Modern Israel and Biblical Interpretation 05:43 Covenant Theology and Its Implications 08:09 America's Role and Support for Israel 10:59 Geopolitical Realities and Future Perspectives 🎧 Listen to full episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or at michaelincontext.com 👍 Like this video, subscribe, and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Can someone truly be saved and show little—or no—fruit? Dr. Michael Easley tackles one of the most misunderstood questions in Christian circles: what fruit actually means in Scripture. Using passages like Matthew 7, John 15, and Galatians 5, Dr. E explains how Jesus’ command to “know them by their fruit” applies to false prophets, not to everyday believers struggling to grow.In this episode, you’ll learn why assurance of salvation is rooted in Christ’s finished work, not in visible performance or moral scorekeeping. Dr. Easley also explores the Lordship Salvation debate, the tension between works and grace, and the danger of “fruit inspection” as a measuring stick for someone’s faith.Whether you’re wrestling with your own assurance, worried about your children’s salvation, or navigating difficult conversations around sin and spiritual growth, this episode brings clarity, comfort, and a biblical foundation for confidence in Christ alone. Key Topics Covered -What Jesus meant by “fruit” in Matthew 7 -How to understand John 15 and the vine metaphor -The fruit of the Spirit vs. fruit inspection -The Lordship Salvation debate (MacArthur vs. Ryrie) -Can a Christian live in sin and still be saved? -How to judge sin without judging salvation -Where true assurance of salvation comes from -Why believers need God’s Word, God’s Spirit & God’s people Chapters 00:00 — Can someone be saved without showing fruit? 01:10 — What Jesus meant by “fruit” in Matthew 7 03:00 — The Lordship Salvation debate 05:00 — Deeds of the flesh vs. fruit of the Spirit 06:20 — Why fruit isn’t proof of salvation 08:10 — Judging sin vs. judging salvation 09:45 — Parents, kids, and “proof of salvation” 11:00 — Where assurance actually comes from 12:20 — God’s Word, God’s Spirit, God’s people 14:00 — Final encouragement If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Can you lose your salvation? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley answers one of the most common (and often most anxiety-filled) questions Christians ask. Dr. E walks through key Scriptures, the history behind Arminianism and Calvinism, the Synod of Dort, the TULIP debate, and the difference between eternal security and assurance of salvation.If you’ve wrestled with doubt, struggled with confusing passages like Hebrews 6, or wondered how sin affects your walk with Christ, this episode brings biblical clarity anchored in the finished work of Jesus. Key Topics Covered -Eternal security vs. assurance of salvation -Arminianism vs. Calvinism explained -The Synod of Dort and TULIP -What Scripture says about salvation and sealing -The role of the Trinity in salvation -Understanding Hebrews 6 and “warning passages” -Can a Christian live in sin and still be saved? Chapters 00:00 – Can You Lose Your Salvation? 00:42 – Why This Question Matters 01:10 – Arminianism vs. Calvinism (Quick Overview) 02:00 – Election, Grace, and the TULIP Debate 03:10 – Eternal Security vs. Assurance 04:00 – What the Father, Son & Spirit Each Do in Salvation 04:50 – Key Scriptures on Eternal Security 06:15 – Misused Passages: 2 Peter & Proverbs 06:45 – The Hebrews 6 Debate 08:10 – Can Sin Make You Lose Salvation? 09:20 – Fruit, Works, and Spiritual Maturity 11:00 – What About Christians Living in Sin? 13:00 – Why We Can’t Judge Another’s Salvation 14:10 – Final Encouragement & Next Week’s Question Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Can you be a Christian and not go to church? In this short Ask Dr. E episode, Dr. Michael Easley walks through Hebrews 10:19–25 to explain why the Christian life is designed to be lived together. Salvation is rooted in faith alone—yet the “one another” commands throughout the New Testament show why spiritual growth, encouragement, accountability, and service flourish inside the local church. Whether you're struggling with church hurt, drifted after the pandemic, or wondering if community is optional, this episode offers clarity and grace rooted in Scripture. Key Topics -Why church attendance isn’t what saves you -How Hebrews 10 shapes the Christian’s call to gather -The three exhortations: Draw near, Hold fast, Stir up -Why the “one another” life requires a local body -How your gifts matter to your church—and why you matter to them Chapters 00:00 – Why This Question Matters 00:25 – Can You Be a Christian and Not Go to Church? 01:00 – Post-Pandemic Drift & Distrust of Churches 01:45 – Hebrews 10:19–25 Explained 02:35 – Draw Near: Access Through Christ 03:10 – Hold Fast: Hope Anchored in Our High Priest 03:55 – Stir Up One Another: Love & Good Deeds 04:40 – What “Stimulate One Another” Really Means 05:20 – Why You Can’t Live the Christian Life Alone 06:10 – “Not Forsaking Gathering Together” in Context 07:05 – The Power of the One-Another Commands 08:00 – Church vs. Mere “Community” 08:45 – Why the Local Church Needs You 09:20 – A Loving Push: Get Back to Church 🎧 Listen to full episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or at michaelincontext.com If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

What does Revelation mean when it says there will be “no longer any sea”? Does this mean no beaches in heaven? No oceans? In today’s episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley explains the biblical symbolism of the sea, the continuity between this earth and the New Heaven and New Earth, and why the glory of Christ will overshadow every earthly landscape we imagine. We look at Genesis, Revelation 20–21, millennial views, and the tension between literal and symbolic imagery. Most importantly, Dr. E reminds us that eternity will be physical, joyful, purposeful, and more beautiful than anything we cling to now. 📌 Key Topics: – What the “sea” represents in Genesis and Revelation – Why Revelation 21 says “no more sea” – Whether heaven will have beaches, oceans, and landscapes – What life will be like in the New Heaven and New Earth – Why Christ’s presence will overwhelm every earthly desire 00:00 – Will there be beaches in heaven? 00:33 – The symbolism of the sea in Scripture 01:18 – “No longer any sea” in Revelation 21 02:10 – Context of the Millennium and New Earth 03:05 – Will there be landscapes, seasons, stars? 04:22 – Physicality and activity in eternity 05:30 – Why Christ’s glory eclipses earthly beauty 06:18 – Could there be rivers, trees, beaches? 07:04 – What we know and what we don’t 07:45 – Final encouragement Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Did Old Testament believers know about heaven and hell? In this episode of Ask Dr. E, Dr. Michael Easley unpacks what ancient Israelites believed about eternity, salvation, and the afterlife. Through passages from Psalms, Daniel, and Job, Dr. E reveals how figures like David, Enoch, and Job expressed faith in eternal life—long before the New Testament. 📖 Topics Covered: 00:00 Intro & Question from Daniel 01:30 What Sheol and Abaddon Really Mean 04:10 David, Enoch, and Job’s Understanding of Eternity 06:45 How Daniel 12 Describes Heaven and Hell 08:50 Why the Ancients Knew More Than We Think Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Should You Take The Bible Literally? Q: I have a friend who has recently grown in their Christian faith, and part of that growth has been a new belief and interest in the Bible. However, this has led them to taking the scripture so literally that they now strongly believe that the earth is flat. They cite Isaiah 11:12– the four corners of the earth. Psalm 104:5– being set on immovable “foundations” (it will not totter). And Genesis 1:6–8– having a solid firmament. The core of their argument: “If Scripture is God’s Word and perfect, why reinterpret it to fit modern science? Shouldn’t we interpret science through the Bible—not the Bible through science?” Summary What happens when someone reads the Bible too literally? In this episode, Dr. E responds to a listener’s question about a friend who believes the earth is flat—because “the Bible says so.” Dr. E unpacks why context matters in interpretation, using hermeneutics—the grammatical, historical, literal, and theological principles that guide faithful reading. While Scripture is perfect and true, hyper-literalism can distort its meaning when genre, audience, or idiom are ignored. Dr. E explains that phrases like “the four corners of the earth” or “the eyes of the Lord” are poetic or symbolic, not scientific. God’s Word reveals the truth about Himself and His creation—but it’s not meant to be a physics textbook. This episode helps believers discern when to take Scripture literally and when to understand it figuratively, so that we honor both the authority and intent of God’s Word. Takeaways Good hermeneutics keeps interpretation faithful, not fanciful. The Bible uses poetic and symbolic language to reveal truth. “Four corners of the earth” reflects language, not geography. Hyper-literalism can miss the heart of what God intends to teach. Scripture is sufficient for faith—not a science textbook. Context, audience, and theology must guide every interpretation. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: Why were Adam and Eve the first people? How are there so many nationalities today? Why is there a time period where not much is written about Jesus? Summary In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna wrap up their three-week journey through Sydney’s questions, diving into biblical origins, Jesus’ early life, and the purpose of Scripture itself. Dr. E explores why God created Adam and Eve as the first people and how nationalities came to be, tracing it back to the Tower of Babel and God’s plan for humanity to fill the earth. The discussion turns to Jesus’ “silent years,” the time between His childhood and public ministry, and what Scripture intentionally reveals—and withholds—about His life. Dr. E reminds listeners that the Bible gives us everything we need for faith and godliness: to understand our sin condition, God’s love, His redemption through Christ, and His eternal plan. While many of our questions may remain unanswered on earth, eternity will bring clarity beyond imagination. Heaven won’t be an endless church service in the clouds—it will be a perfect, unhindered relationship with the Triune God, filled with purpose, joy, and awe. Takeaways Adam and Eve were created as image bearers with the capacity to relate to God. The Tower of Babel explains the origins of languages and nationalities. Scripture doesn’t answer every question—it gives what we need for faithfulness. Jesus’ “silent years” remind us that God reveals what is essential, not exhaustive. Heaven will be an eternal, unhindered relationship with the Triune God. Eternity will bring clarity to the mysteries we can’t grasp on earth. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: How can God know the future? How can God make everything? Summary How can God know the future? Dr. E unpacks this question by pointing to Scripture’s prophetic precision. From Isaiah’s writings—700 years before Christ—to Jeremiah’s prophecy of Israel’s exile and return, the Bible repeatedly reveals God’s perfect foreknowledge. Archaeological discoveries, such as the Assyrian carvings of Israel’s captivity and the Pontius Pilate stone, confirm what Scripture already declared true. Dr. E reminds us: the Bible doesn’t need to be proven—it proves the evidence around it. God knows the future because He wrote it. The conversation then turns to creation itself—how God made everything ex nihilo (“out of nothing”). While humanity can invent and build using existing materials, only God can bring something into being by His word alone. From forming Adam from the dust to speaking the cosmos into existence, creation reveals God’s unmatched power and sovereignty. In a world that marvels at human innovation, Dr. E points us back to the Creator who authored time, matter, and life itself. Takeaways Biblical prophecy demonstrates God’s complete foreknowledge. Archaeological evidence supports, not disproves, Scripture. God’s promises—like Israel’s return from exile—always come true. Humanity can create from something, but only God creates from nothing. God’s sovereignty extends over all time, space, and creation. The Bible’s truth continually aligns with world history. If you’ve been wondering whether faith and evidence can align, this is one you won’t want to miss. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: How did God create Himself? Where did God come from? How can God see everyone at the same time? Summary In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna dive into two main questions: Where did God come from? and How can God see everyone at the same time? Dr. E explains that Scripture reveals God as eternal—He has always existed and always will. Passages like Psalm 90 and Isaiah 40 affirm God’s existence “from everlasting to everlasting,” reminding us that He alone is the Creator and sustainer of all things. From the vastness of galaxies seen through the James Webb Telescope to the microscopic precision of an atom, creation itself bears God’s fingerprints. They also explore God’s omniscience and omnipresence—His ability to see and know everything at once. Using Psalm 139 and 2 Chronicles 16:9, Dr. E unpacks how God’s eyes roam the earth to strengthen those whose hearts belong to Him. Unlike Satan, who prowls step by step, God perceives all at once and intimately knows every detail of our lives. He doesn’t just see humanity collectively—He sees you personally. This eternal, all-knowing God is not distant but deeply present, caring, and actively engaged with those who are fully His. Takeaways God has always existed—He has no beginning and no end. Scripture, not speculation, defines our understanding of God’s eternality. Creation—from galaxies to atoms—reveals God’s creative power and design. God is omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent—everywhere, all-knowing, all-powerful. Psalm 139 reminds us that God knows our thoughts, actions, and words before we do. God’s all-seeing nature isn’t distant; it’s personal, intimate, and loving. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: Dr. E, my question concerns prayer. Does God ever tell us not to pray for someone or something? What does this say about the power or purpose of prayer? Jeremiah 7:16 God states do not pray for those people, when he found that Judah was not inclined to repent. In the New Testament, John 17:9 Jesus did not pray for the world, but those you have given me. Summary In this episode. Dr. E unpacks a fascinating question rooted in Scripture: when God told the prophet Jeremiah not to pray for Judah, what did He mean—and what does that teach us about prayer today? Dr. Easley explains that Jeremiah’s command was a specific prophetic instruction tied to judgment, not a model for believers today. In contrast, we’re repeatedly told to “pray without ceasing” and to bring everything before the Lord. Prayer, he reminds us, isn’t a formula or a way to change God’s mind—it’s an alignment of our hearts with His will. “The litmus test for prayer,” Dr. Easley says, “is whether the answer would glorify God.” It’s not outcome-based but obedience-based. Drawing on examples from Jeremiah, Jonah, and Jesus’ high priestly prayer in John 17, Dr. Easley helps us see prayer not as a spiritual wish list, but as humble communication with our Creator—rooted in trust, surrender, and reverence. Takeaways Prayer isn’t about changing God’s mind—it’s about aligning our hearts with His will. God’s command to Jeremiah not to pray was a specific act of judgment, not a model for believers. The purpose of prayer is to glorify God, not to secure the results we want. Even Jesus prayed, “Not my will, but Yours be done,” modeling perfect submission. True peace comes when we bring our requests to God and trust His verdict. The best prayers we can pray are those shaped by Scripture and God’s revealed Word. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: The death of John MacArthur. I've heard Abner Chou in both a Sunday evening church service and seminary chapel, eulogize Mac Arthur and claim that "all heaven gave him a “standing ovation” when he died.” In Chou’s mind, MacArthur is elevated to the position of the apostle Paul. Is there any scriptural basis for this type of recognition of a man entering heaven? The hero worship grates on me. I’m a widow; all men die. Some men fought for our country; others were martyred. This type of eulogy detracts from my Savior, the one who died for all of us. Summary In this episode of Ask Dr. E, a listener raises a question following the passing of John MacArthur: is there biblical basis for imagining heaven giving a standing ovation when a well-known Christian leader arrives? Dr. E explains that while it is appropriate to acknowledge the ministry impact of faithful men and women, Scripture makes it clear—Christ alone is the hero. Hero worship, even in subtle forms, distracts from the glory of God. Mature Christians know that heaven is not about applause for accomplishments but worship of the triune God. From church history, we can honor figures like D.L. Moody, Charles Spurgeon, and Billy Graham, but even their legacies fade with time. In contrast, God calls His people not to fame or recognition but to faithfulness. Dr. E reminds us that heaven is not about eulogizing human achievement but magnifying Christ. Our calling is simple: be faithful servants of Christ. Whether known by millions or by a few, believers are celebrated in the right way only when Christ is the focus. God does not ask us to be successful—He asks us to be faithful. Takeaways Hero worship in the church can easily distract from Christ as the true focus. Eulogies should highlight faith in Christ, not human accomplishment. Scripture shows that Christ does not share His glory or worship. God uses flawed people, but their legacies ultimately fade with time. True recognition in heaven is given to faithful servants of God. God calls His people to faithfulness, not worldly success. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: Hi! I recently had a miscarriage and it has been a season that has brought up a lot of questions. I was wondering if you had any insight? If God knits each person together in their mother’s womb, as Psalm 139 describes, then where is God in miscarriage? And if God is the creator of life, why does miscarriage happen? Does He create a life, then immediately change his mind? Do babies who die before they are born go to Heaven? Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a listener’s heartfelt question: Where is God in miscarriage? This painful reality raises deep theological concerns—if God creates life, why does miscarriage happen? Do babies who die before birth go to heaven? Dr. Easley draws on both Scripture and personal experience with infertility to help frame the conversation. Psalm 139 reminds us that God knows us intimately, even from conception, and yet we live in a fallen world where tragedy and loss are unavoidable. Turning to Ecclesiastes, he explains that life under the sun is marked by brokenness, and not every “why” question will be answered this side of eternity. From David’s grief over his infant son in 2 Samuel 12, we see an example of trust: “I will go to him, but he will not return to me.” Ultimately, spiritual maturity means acknowledging our questions while leaning by faith into God’s sovereignty and goodness. Though miscarriage leaves parents with grief and unanswered questions, God’s Word assures us that He is near to the brokenhearted and offers peace that surpasses understanding. Takeaways Miscarriage raises difficult questions about God’s role in life and loss. Scripture teaches that God knows and forms every life from conception. We live as fallen people in a fallen world, where tragedy is inevitable. David’s response to his infant’s death shows trust in God despite grief. Maturity in faith means setting aside unanswered “why” questions. God is near to the brokenhearted and offers peace beyond understanding. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: I have been taught the holiness, grace, and righteous wrath of the Lord my whole life. However I've begun to struggle deeply with the nature of God and His love. If God is sovereign and desires that all be saved, why does He not do so? Wouldn't that be the natural expression of His love? That not happening feels like a betrayal of what I've known His character to be. I know He can do whatever He desires, but I don't understand why He doesn't redeem all. Summary In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna tackle a challenging theological question: If God is sovereign and loving, why doesn’t He save everyone? At the heart of this question lies the tension between God’s perfect nature and humanity’s sinful condition. Scripture affirms that God desires none to perish (2 Peter 3:9), yet salvation requires faith in Christ. Universalism—the belief that everyone will ultimately be saved—fails to account for God’s holiness and justice. If God simply overlooked sin, He would no longer be just. Dr. E explains that our human perspective of fairness is shaped by sin, while God’s nature is defined by His Word—He is all-powerful, all-knowing, ever-present, loving, and just. Through Christ’s sacrifice, God offers the one and only remedy for sin. Just as one cure is effective for a disease while others fall short, only Christ’s saving work secures eternal life. Hanna reflects that many underestimate the seriousness of sin, which diminishes how good the gospel truly is. When we recognize the depth of our sinful condition, we see God’s love and mercy more clearly. Salvation is not earned but received by faith in Christ alone, who lived, died, and rose again. Takeaways God desires none to perish, but salvation requires faith in Christ. Universalism overlooks God’s holiness and justice. Our sense of fairness is distorted by sin. Scripture, not feelings, defines God’s character. Christ’s death and resurrection provide the only true cure for sin. Recognizing our sin magnifies the beauty of God’s love. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: In the women’s ministry at my church, there is a woman who encourages many of the Bible study facilitators to attend an outside event/separate ministry to receive deliverance. At first, I was intrigued, but then after prayer and research, started to have discernment about this. I’m looking for clarification on the topic. My understanding is Jesus is the deliverer. Through daily practice of prayer on our own and with others, reading the Word, and tuning into the Holy Spirit- we will be sanctified and therefore delivered from (rejection, anger, addiction, etc). This event is where people are praying over you individually but in a corporate setting and they are claiming to deliver you of evil spirits. That seems to be elevating people over God. This deliverance ministry does claim Jesus as Lord but this doesn't seem biblically sound. Can you clarify more on this topic? Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a listener’s concern about deliverance ministry that claims to free people from evil spirits through prayer and pronouncement. While Scripture records Jesus and the apostles casting out demons, Dr. E emphasizes that the New Testament never instructs believers or churches to continue these practices as an ongoing ministry. Instead, the biblical pattern for Christians is to stand firm in the faith, resist temptation, and live under the control of the Holy Spirit. Dr. E explains that a believer indwelt by the Holy Spirit cannot be possessed by demons, though Satan and his forces will harass and tempt us. The danger of deliverance ministries, he notes, is that they can elevate human leaders and rituals above Christ, and in doing so, diminish the sufficiency of Jesus’ finished work on the cross. True freedom does not come through formulaic prayers or rituals, but by walking faithfully with God through His Word, His Spirit, and His people. Ultimately, Dr. E encourages discernment. If something feels unbiblical, measure it against Scripture. Christ is enough, and believers can live in confidence that “greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world.” Takeaways Scripture records demonic encounters, but it never prescribes ongoing deliverance rituals for the church. A believer indwelt by the Holy Spirit cannot be possessed by demons. Temptation and harassment are real, but God calls us to stand firm and resist. Deliverance ministries risk undermining Christ’s finished work by adding extra steps. Discernment is vital—if something feels unbiblical, test it against God’s Word. True freedom comes through Christ’s sacrifice and walking with God’s Word, Spirit, and people. Links Mentioned Alisa Childers Youtube Channel Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: As a fellow believer who adopted a pair of siblings who were 5+ years of age, how best may we seek to reverse what seem to be ‘generational curses’? Summary In this episode, Dr. E tackles a difficult question from an adoptive parent wrestling with the idea of “generational curses” and the lingering effects of brokenness. Dr. Easley reminds us that while Scripture warns about the consequences of sin, it does not teach that children are doomed by their parents’ failures. Instead, each person is responsible before God for their own life and choices. At the same time, we can’t ignore the very real challenges that come with adoption: past trauma, struggles with attachment, and the weight parents feel to somehow “fix” their children. Through both biblical teaching and personal experience, Dr. Easley points listeners back to the steady hope of the gospel. Parents cannot control outcomes—but they can faithfully love, nurture, and pray, trusting the Lord to do what only He can do. Adoption mirrors our place in God’s family: welcomed, broken, yet deeply loved. This conversation is an honest encouragement for adoptive parents, foster families, and anyone walking through the complexity of raising children in a fallen world. Takeaways The Bible teaches consequences of sin can affect generations, but children are not guilty of their parents’ sins. Misapplications of “generational curses” are common in some ministries, but Scripture does not provide formulas for breaking them. Adoption is rooted in brokenness—children come from loss and often trauma that families must carefully navigate. Attachment theories can be helpful, but they are not ultimate; only God heals hearts and secures identity. Parents can disciple, love, and encourage, but they cannot control the spiritual outcomes of their children’s lives. Hope rests in Christ, who loves our children more than we do and continues His work even when the path is difficult. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].

Q: What are your thoughts on Michael Tait, DC talk, how the industry should respond, and what CCM listeners should do as far as keeping music in rotation? Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a thoughtful question about contemporary Christian music (CCM) artists who fall into moral failure. Should believers continue listening to their music? Should the Christian music industry respond differently when artists face scandals? Dr. E and Hanna discuss how these questions are not new. From Amy Grant to Sandy Patty, the industry has long wrestled with balancing ministry and business. While some organizations once pulled music from the shelves, today financial interests often outweigh ethical concerns. At the heart of the issue is Paul’s instruction in 1 Thessalonians 5:21–22: “Examine everything carefully; hold fast to what is good; abstain from every form of evil.” Dr. E encourages believers to take this personally and seriously. If supporting a particular artist or listening to their music troubles your conscience, don’t do it. But at the same time, he reminds listeners that we live in a fallen world where every industry—including Christian music—will reflect sin. Takeaways Believers must examine carefully and hold fast to what is good (1 Thess. 5:21–22). If listening to certain music troubles your conscience, it’s wise to avoid it. The CCM industry is often driven by profit more than ethics. Moral failure among Christian leaders and artists is nothing new. God can still use flawed ministries to spread the gospel. Our trust must rest in Christ, not in celebrities or cultural figures. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at [email protected].