The Scientific Enneagram | A Discussion w. Danielle Fuller
Around the Circle | An Enneagram Channel · Jeff Cook and T.J. Wilson
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (episodes.captivate.fm) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
For the Full Episode go to | www.aroundthecircle.org
What happens when engineers, psychologists, and Enneagram coaches meet in one person? You get Danielle Fuller—founder of Scientific Enneagram, expert in data, and a compelling voice at the intersection of systems theory and personality work.
In this episode, we dive deep with Danielle into the scientific validity of the Enneagram: What counts as science? Can the Enneagram ever be falsifiable? How does it overlap with models like Big Five, attachment theory, and ego development? And what kind of research might meaningfully elevate Enneagram discourse?
We also explore why the Enneagram may resist quantification—because it’s aimed at motives, not behaviors—and why that doesn’t disqualify it as a tool for serious study. Danielle brings a unique blend of logic and curiosity, and we’re thrilled to share this rich, thoughtful conversation.
Find Danielle at @scientificenneagram and at scientificenneagram.com.