PLAY PODCASTS
Episode 9: The Library as State Authority, Part III

Episode 9: The Library as State Authority, Part III

Anxiety in the Archives: A Podcast Dissertation · Elizabeth D. Headrick, MLS

April 2, 202434m 16s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (static1.squarespace.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Original episode page

Show Notes

In which we finally wrap up this theme…

Read the Transcript Read the Transcript

Episode 9 Footnotes

  1. Budapest Open Access Initiative, 2023, www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/. 

  2. Suber, Peter. “Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.” Internet Archive Wayback Machine, 2003, web.archive.org/web/20130129061341/www.earlham.edu:80/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm.

  3. Duncan, Rod. The Custodian of Marvels (The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire Book 3). Angry Robot, 2016.

  4. Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al. “Academic Review Promotion and Tenure Documents Promote a View of Open Access That Is at Odds with the Wider Academic Community.” LSE Impact Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science, 18 July 2019, https://bit.ly/4hC6QYz. 

  5. Gross, P. L., and E. M. Gross. “College Libraries and Chemical Education.” Science, vol. 66, no. 1713, 28 Oct. 1927, pp. 385–389, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.66.1713.385.

  6. Archambault, Éric, and Vincent Larivière. “History of the Journal Impact Factor: Contingencies and Consequences.” Scientometrics, vol. 79, no. 3, 31 Jan. 2009, pp. 635–649, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x.

  7. Caine, Rachel. Sword and Pen (The Great Library Book 5). Berkley, 2019.

  8. Archambault and Larivière

  9. Archambault and Larivière

  10. Wical, Stephanie H., and Gregory J. Kocken. “Open Access and Promotion and Tenure Evaluation Plans at the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire.” Serials Review, vol. 43, no. 2, 2017, pp. 111–119, https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1313024.

  11. Duncan, Custodian

  12. Duncan, Custodian

  13. Besançon, Lonni, et al. “Open science saves lives: Lessons from the covid-19 pandemic.” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 21, no. 1, 5 June 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y.

  14. Beninger, Peter G., et al. “Debasing the currency of science: The growing menace of Predatory Open Access Journals.” Journal of Shellfish Research, vol. 35, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.2983/035.035.0101.

  15. Glasziou, Paul P, et al. “Waste in COVID-19 research.” BMJ, 12 May 2020, p. M1847, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1847.

  16. Caine, Sword and Pen

  17. Beall, Jeffrey. “Predatory Journals Exploit Structural Weaknesses in Scholarly Publishing.” 4open, vol. 1, 2018, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2018001.

  18. Beall, Jeffrey. “The Open-Access Movement is Not Really About Open Access.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, vol. 11, no. 2, 2013, pp. 589–597, https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525. 

← All episodes of Anxiety in the Archives: A Podcast Dissertation