PLAY PODCASTS
Flowers, Crosses, Clauses and Oaths

Flowers, Crosses, Clauses and Oaths

Present-tense SCOTUS decision analysis that reaches all the way back to the Magna Carta for context.

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts · Slate Audio

June 22, 20191h 3m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (sphinx.acast.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

A flurry of decisions this week, but few big-ticket items. Mark Joseph Stern takes us through  the opinions and dissents in Flowers v Mississippi, Gundy v United States and American Legion v American Humanist Association. Dahlia Lithwick is also joined by Jed Shugerman and Andrew Kent of Fordham University Law School, two of the authors of the Harvard Law Review article, Faithful Execution and Article II, which examines whether the constitution holds the President to some higher standard than just not doing crimes.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.