PLAY PODCASTS
NRA Vs Vullo: Why The Supreme Court Decision Is More About The First Amendment Than The Second Amendment
Episode 729

NRA Vs Vullo: Why The Supreme Court Decision Is More About The First Amendment Than The Second Amendment

Michigan State University law professor Adam Candeub assesses the recent Supreme Court unanimous ruling in the NRA vs Vullo case. While the National Rifle Association was the plaintiff in the case, it was not about guns or the Second Amendment directly. It was more about First Amendment rights and whether government officials can use their positions to pressure businesses into conducting business (or not) in a specific way. Form more information about Prof Candeub: https://www.law.msu.edu/faculty_staff/profile.php?prof=370 For more information about the case: https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/05/supreme-court-rules-for-nra-in-first-amendment-dispute/

American Viewpoints · Adam Candeub, Mike Ferguson

July 9, 202410m 1s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (cdn.simplecast.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Michigan State University law professor Adam Candeub assesses the recent Supreme Court unanimous ruling in the NRA vs Vullo case. While the National Rifle Association was the plaintiff in the case, it was not about guns or the Second Amendment directly. It was more about First Amendment rights and whether government officials can use their positions to pressure businesses into conducting business (or not) in a specific way.  Form more information about Prof Candeub: https://www.law.msu.edu/faculty_staff/profile.php?prof=370 For more information about the case: https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/05/supreme-court-rules-for-nra-in-first-amendment-dispute/

Topics

national rifle associationcenter for renewing americasupreme courtnrascotus