PLAY PODCASTS
Prior Restraint and Project Veritas
Episode 186

Prior Restraint and Project Veritas

On today’s podcast, David and Sarah open with the puzzling case of Project Veritas and James O'Keefe. Why is a New York appeals court appearing to let stand a prior restraint on the press? They then answer a fascinating reader mail question before wrapping up with an extended discussion of self-defense in the context of an incredibly troubling Texas shooting that was caught on tape.

Advisory Opinions

November 29, 20211h 10m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (mgln.ai) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

On today’s podcast, David and Sarah open with the puzzling case of Project Veritas and James O'Keefe. Why is a New York appeals court appearing to let stand a prior restraint on the press? They then answer a fascinating reader mail question before wrapping up with an extended discussion of self-defense in the context of an incredibly troubling Texas shooting that was caught on tape.

 

Show Notes:

-Near v. Minnesota

-New York Times Co. v. United States

-University of Richmond Law Review: “The Meaning of Life (or Limb)”

-Reason: “Are People Allowed to Use Deadly Force to Defend Property?”

-Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: “Widow releases video of Chad Read's fatal shooting in South Lubbock”

-Warning Graphic: Lubbock, Texas shooting video

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices