PLAY PODCASTS
An Inconsequential Term?

An Inconsequential Term?

Advisory Opinions

July 17, 20251h 20m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (mgln.ai) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Sarah Isgur, David French, and Kannon Shanmugam again reunite for the annual Paul, Weiss summer associate live recording. The three discuss Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s mysterious jurisprudence, political pressure on the Supreme Court bench, and firmly bound, braggadocious briefs.Plus: billable hours, a (not) blockbuster term, and Sarah’s insecurity over Texas’ quaint size.


The Agenda:
—The Biter and Aqua Girl
Trump v. Casa, injunctions, and class actions
—Pushback on Justice Jackson as the #Resistance justice (and how to write an email)
—Splitting the baby on paper vs. digital cert petitions
—Guess where Kannon puts his Supreme Court quill pens
—It wasn’t a blockbuster term
—Circuit court crash course
Don’t mess with Texas
—My big fat 9th Circuit Court
—Free speech or parental rights? United States v. Skrmetti and Mahmoud v. Taylor


This episode is brought to you by Burford Capital, the leading global finance firm focused on law.
Burford helps companies and law firms unlock the value of their legal assets. With a $7.2 billion portfolio and listings on the NYSE and LSE, Burford provides capital to finance high-value commercial litigation and arbitration—without adding cost, risk, or giving up control.
Clients include Fortune 500 companies and Am Law 100 firms, who turn to Burford to pursue strong claims, manage legal costs, and accelerate recoveries.
Learn more at burfordcapital.com/ao.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices